Ergi Kirkin vs Maximilian Figl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 12:54 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Kirkin vs M. Figl

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kirkin 1 - 0 Figl
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ergi Kirkin winning 2 and Maximilian Figl winning 1. The last match between Ergi Kirkin and Maximilian Figl was at the M25 Montesilvano, 06-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Ergi Kirkin getting the victory 5-7 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kirkin | 1 |
| Figl | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Montesilvano(08-06-25)
E. Kirkin vs M. Figl H2H Profile
E. Kirkin vs M. Figl Match Preview:
- Kirkin wins 40.9% of second serve points, whereas Figl wins 45.54% over the last six months, making Figl stronger in this area.
- Who excels in return games? Figl wins 47.01% of opponents' second serves compared to Kirkin's 44.48%, but Kirkin edges out slightly on first serve returns with 30.24% versus Figl's 28.89%.
- Under pressure, Kirkin has saved 54.24% of breakpoints, showing more resilience than Figl, who saves 49.72%.
- Last year's match outcomes favor Figl with a 60.53% win rate, as opposed to Kirkin's 53.45%.
- Both players are strongest on clay, but Kirkin has a higher overall win percentage (62%) compared to Figl's 54%.
- Kirkin typically competes in higher-level tournaments, although with a lower win rate of 39.29%, compared to Figl's successful 60.53% win rate at lower-tier events.
- Kirkin combats higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 381.84, compared to Figl's average of 168.68.
- Could a deciding set alter the outcome? Kirkin wins 62% of deciding sets, outperforming Figl’s 42% success rate.
- In terms of converting breakpoints, Kirkin turns 37.65% of chances into breaks, while Figl manages 31.15%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Kirkin and Figl brings an intriguing clash of strengths and weaknesses. While Figl demonstrates superior performance in second serve wins and return games, Kirkin's slightly better breakpoint saving ability under pressure could play a pivotal role in tight situations.
On clay, both players share a favorite surface, but Kirkin's higher win percentage provides a slight edge over Figl. Despite Kirkin facing higher-ranked opponents, the experience might prove beneficial. Moreover, Kirkin's stronger performance in deciding sets positions them advantageously if the match extends to a final set.
Considering these factors, Kirkin appears to be the likely winner in this matchup given their resilience in clutch moments and superior ability to navigate high-pressure situations.
Ergi Kirkin vs Maximilian Figl Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Kirkin vs M. Figl H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:19:40 | Average Match Time | 2:19:40 |
| 51% (37/72) | 1st Serve % | 66% (59/89) |
| 62% (23/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (34/59) |
| 63% (22/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 45% (40/89) | Return Points Win % | 38% (27/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Kirkin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Rubber 1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
M. Figl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 4-1 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||

E. Kirkin vs M. Figl Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.25% (285/196) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.99% (103/99) |
| 55.84% (631/499) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.08% (241/213) |
| 52.07% (5473/5037) | Games Win/Loss | 51.46% (2250/2122) |
| 58.46% (76/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 39.39% (13/20) |
| 62.13% (187/114) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.66% (88/76) |
| 44.68% (21/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1241 | Aces Total | 169 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1198 | Total Double Faults | 286 |
| 1:42:35 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 478.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 226.02 |
| 57% (18658/32657) | 1st Serve % | 64% (3755/5854) |
| 66% (12384/18658) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2293/3755) |
| 48% (6726/14008) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1001/2099) |
| 47% (1692/3608) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (264/607) |
| 43% (13874/32415) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2342/5758) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.90% (84/99) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.47% (198/87) | Futures W/L | 50.99% (103/99) |
| 59% (278/474) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (102/196) |
| 100% (5/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (69/123) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (24/42) |
| 62% (102/165) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (21/56) |
| 89% (244/216) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (107/92) |
| 11% (244/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (107/14) |
| 29% (237/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (95/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
